Manual Versus Automatic Fitting
Manual Versus Automatic Fitting
The documentation below describes how to create a belt path, to fit it to the structure, then mesh it and finally to create a contact between belt and dummy. When a new belt definition is created this process needs to be followed in that sequence, and is referred to as "manual" fitting since it is totally interactive.
Once you have a belt definition in a model you can change the geometry of the model and use the Auto-refit function to repeat the fit / mesh / contact process above in a single automatic step for reasonably simple belt paths. This can be performed both interactively and via batch (command-line) commands. This process is commonly used to perform stochastic analyses where the dummy and seat are moved through a range of positions, refitting the belt automatically each time.
It is also possible to combine these two processes: you can adjust the shape of an existing belt path in the path editor or by external means, then use Auto-refit to perform the fit / mesh / contact process automatically rather than manually. Some users have created processes that update belt path points as well as modifying structure nodes.
Generally speaking:
| Manual fitting: |
|
| Automatic refitting: |
|
The choice of processes is up to you, but most users will find that automatic refitting is preferable once a *BELT definition has been created.